RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceХимическая физика Advances in Chemical Physics

  • ISSN (Print) 0207-401X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6126

The Impact of Water on Polylactide – Polybutylene Adipinate Terephthalate Blends

PII
10.31857/S0207401X24030116-1
DOI
10.31857/S0207401X24030116
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 43 / Issue number 3
Pages
103-111
Abstract
Mixing in the melt followed by pressing, blends of polylactide — polybutylene adipate terephthalate of various compositions were obtained. The content of polybutylene adipate terephthalate in blends was 10, 20 and 30 wt. %. The effect of water on film samples at a temperature of 22 ± 2°C for 270 days was studied. After exposure to water, a change in morphology was detected: turbidity of the samples and the appearance of defects. The thermophysical characteristics before and after hydrolytic degradation were determined by differential scanning calorimetry. A decrease in the cold crystallization temperature in pure polylactide and with a low content of polybutylene adipate terephthalate, and the disappearance of the cold crystallization peak at a content of 20 and 30 wt. % of polybutylene adipate terephthalate were shown. The degree of crystallinity of polylactide after exposure to water tended to increase. Changes in the chemical structure of mixed samples were monitored by IR spectroscopy.
Keywords
смеси полимеров полилактид полибутиленадипинаттерефталат степень кристалличности гидролитическая деструкция ИК-спектры
Date of publication
14.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
3

References

  1. 1. Тертышная Ю.В., Подзорова М.В. // ЖПХ. 2021. Т. 94. № 5. С. 638; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044461821050121
  2. 2. Zhou Q., Xanthos M. // Polym. Eng. Sci. 2010. V. 50. №2. P. 320e330; https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.21520
  3. 3. Тертышная Ю.В., Подзорова М.В, Храмкова А.В. // Хим. физика. 2023. Т. 42. №1. С. 35; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23010090
  4. 4. Olewnik-Kruszkowska E. // Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2016. V. 129. P. 87; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.04.009
  5. 5. Scaffaro R., Lopresti F., Botta L. // Eur. Polym. J. 2017. V. 96. P. 266; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.09.016
  6. 6. Elsawya M.A., Kimc K.-H., Parkc J.-W., Deepb A. // Renew.Sust. Energ. Rev. 2017. Vol. 79. P. 1346; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.143
  7. 7. Rapacz-Kmita A., Stodolak-Zych E., Szaraniec B., Gajek M., Dudek P. // Mater. Lett. 2015. V. 146. P. 73; https://doi.org/10.1515/adms-2016-0002
  8. 8. Karpova S.G., Tertyshnaya Y.V., Podzorova M.V., Popov A.A. // Polym Sci Ser A. 2021. V. 63. P. 515; https://doi.org/10.31857/S2308112021050060
  9. 9. Варьян И.А., Колесникова Н.Н., Попов А.А. // Хим. физика. 2021. Т. 40. № 12. С. 42; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X21120153
  10. 10. Kijchavengkul T., Auras R., Rubino M. et al. // Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2010. V. 95. P. 2641; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.07.018
  11. 11. Zhang M., Jia H., Weng Y., Lia C. // Int. Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2019. V. 145. P. 104817; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2019.104817
  12. 12. Nofar M., Heuzey M.C., Carreau P.J., Kamal M.R., Randall J. // J. Rheol. 2016. V. 60. P. 637; https://doi.org/10.1122/1.4953446
  13. 13. Jian J., Xiangbin Z., Xianbo H. // Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2020. V. 3. № 1. P. 19; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2020.01.001
  14. 14. Meaurio E., Zuza E., Sarasua J.R. // Macromolecules 2005. V. 38. № 22. P. 9221; https://doi.org/10.1021/ma051591m
  15. 15. Kumara P.H.S., Nagasawa N., Yagi T., Tamada M. // J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008. V. 109. № 5. P. 3321; https://doi.org/10.1002/app.28402
  16. 16. Zhao X., Hu H., Wang X. et al. // RSC Adv. 2020. V. 10. № 22. P. 13316; https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA01801E
  17. 17. Boudaoud N., Benali S., Mincheva R. et al. // Polym Int. 2018. V. 67. № 10. P. 1393; https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.5659
  18. 18. Hocker S.J., Kim W.T., Schniepp H.C., Kranbuehl D.E. // Polymer. 2018. V. 158. P. 72; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.10.031
  19. 19. Bardin A., Gac P.Y. Le, Cérantola S. et al. // Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2020. V. 171. P. 109002; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2019.109002
  20. 20. Gorassi G., Pantani R. // Adv. Polym. Sci. 2016. P. 119; https://doi.org/10.1007/12_2016_12
  21. 21. Tertyshnaya Y.V., Podzorova M.V., Varyan I.A. et al. // Polymers 2023. V. 15. P. 1029; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15041029
  22. 22. Kale B.G., Auras R., Singh S.P. // Packag. Technol. Sci. 2007. V. 20. P. 49; https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.742
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library