- PII
- 10.31857/S0207401X24100035-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0207401X24100035
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 43 / Issue number 10
- Pages
- 36-48
- Abstract
- Benzene and its derivatives are extremely important substances in modern chemical technologies. However, emissions of these substances have an extremely negative impact on the atmosphere and ecology. Benzene is a substance of the second class of danger and its effect on the human body is fraught with serious consequences. In the event of man-made disasters, an urgent task is to convert benzene into less toxic substances. In this work, using a low-pressure flow reactor, the kinetic patterns of the reactions of atomic fluorine with benzene, fluorobenzene, and chlorobenzene at a temperature T = 293 K and a pressure of 0.8–1.3 Torr were established. The concentrations of reagents and products were controlled by molecular beam mass spectrometry. To determine reaction rate constants, the method of competing reactions was used. The reaction of fluorine atoms with cyclohexane was chosen as a competitor. As a result of the analysis using experimental and literature data, the following values of the rate constants of the studied reactions were obtained.
- Keywords
- атомарный фтор бензол фторбензол хлорбензол проточный реактор масс-спектрометрия константа скорости реакции
- Date of publication
- 14.09.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 5
References
- 1. Smith D.J., Setser D.W., Kim K.C. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. 1977. V. 81. № 9. P. 898; https://doi.org/10.1021/j100524a019
- 2. Ebrecht J., Hack W., Wagner H.G. // Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 1989. V. 93. № 5. P. 619; https://doi.org/10.1002/bbpc.19890930520
- 3. Markert F., Pagsberg P. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993. V. 209. № 5-6. P. 445; https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614 (93)80115-6
- 4. Васильев Е.С., Волков Н.Д., Карпов Г.В. и др. // ЖФХ. 2020. Т. 94. № 10. С. 1484; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044453720100295
- 5. Васильев Е.С., Волков Н.Д., Карпов Г.В. и др. // Хим. физика. 2021. Т. 40. № 10. С. 30; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X21100125
- 6. Adamson S.O., Kharlampidi D.D., Shtyrkova A.S. et al. // Atoms. 2023. V. 11. № 10. 132; https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms11100132
- 7. Atkinson R., Baulch D.L., Cox R.A. et al. // Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2006. V. 6. № 11. P. 3625; https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3625-2006
- 8. Васильев Е.С., Карпов Г.В., Шартава Д.К. и др. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 5. С. 10; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22050119
- 9. Морозов И.И., Васильев Е.С., Бутковская Н.И. и др. // Хим. физика. 2023. Т. 42. № 10. C. 26; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23100114
- 10. Pearson R., Cowles J., Hermann G. et al. // IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1973. V. 9. № 9. P. 879; https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.1973.1077761
- 11. Manning R.G., Grant E.R., Merrill J.C. et al. // Intern. J. Chem. Kinet. 1975. V. 7. № 1. P. 39; https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550070106
- 12. NIST Standard Reference Database. Number 69 / Eds. Linstron P.J., Mallard W.G. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2018.
- 13. Heinemann-Fiedler P., Hoyermann K., Rohde G. // Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 1990. V. 94. № 11. P. 1400; https://doi.org/10.1002/bbpc.199000042
- 14. Vasiliev E.S., Morozov I.I., Karpov G.V. // Intern. J. Chem. Kinet. 2019. V. 51. № 12. P. 909; https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.21319
- 15. Atkinson R., Baulch D.L., Cox R.A. et al. // Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2007. V. 7. № 4. P. 981; https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-981-2007
- 16. Васильев Е.С., Морозов И.И., Хак В. и др. // Кинетика и катализ. 2006. Т. 47. № 6. С. 859.
- 17. Адамсон С.О., Харлампиди Д.Д., Штыркова А.С. и др. // Хим. физика. 2024. Т. 43. № 6. С.
- 18. Морозов И.И., Васильев Е.С., Волков Н.Д. и др. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 10. С. 16; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22100089
- 19. Голяк Ил.С., Анфимов Д.Р., Винтайкин И.Б. и др. // Хим. физика. 2023. Т. 42. № 4. C. 3; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23040088
