RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceХимическая физика Advances in Chemical Physics

  • ISSN (Print) 0207-401X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6126

Silicon surface modification with low-energy broad ion beam

PII
S0207401X25050028-1
DOI
10.31857/S0207401X25050028
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 44 / Issue number 5
Pages
15-22
Abstract
Broad ion beam etching by Ar⁺ with low energy up to 1000 eV has been utilized to modify physicochemical properties of the monocrystalline Silicon (100) surface. The silicon surface modification results in etching delay time during its vacuum-plasma etching in a SF₆/O₂/Ar mixture. The etching delay time of the modified Silicon has been found to be significantly affected by conditions of preliminary silicon treatment with the ion beam such as the ion energy and the ion incidence angle. The enhancement in the etching delay time has been detected while lower ion energy and higher ion incidence angle are applied. The combination of the ion beam etching and the vacuum plasma etching could be concerned as the suitable way to form silicon structures.
Keywords
ионно-лучевое травление вакуумно-плазменное травление кремниевые структуры
Date of publication
15.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
4

References

  1. 1. Cao T., Hu T., Zhao Y. // Micromachines. 2020. V. 11. P. 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11070694
  2. 2. Hossain N., Al Mahmud Md Z., Hossain A. et al. // Results Eng. 2024. V. 22. P. 102115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102115
  3. 3. Tozihi M., Zarringari S.S. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2023. V. 17. № 5. P. 1034. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793123050123
  4. 4. Лукин Л.В. // Хим. физика. 2023. T. 42. № 12. С. 54. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23120075
  5. 5. Martirosyan V., Despiau-Pujo E., Dubois J. et al. // J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A. 2018. V. 36. P. 041301. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.5025152
  6. 6. Балдин Е.Д., Воробьева Г.А., Колбанев И.В. и др. // Хим. физика. 2024. Т. 43. № 5. С. 84. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X24010108
  7. 7. Кочетов Н.А., Ковалев И.Д. // Хим. физика. 2024. Т. 43. № 3. С. 76. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X24030086
  8. 8. Shandyba N., Balakirev S., Sharov V. et al. // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023. V. 24. P. 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010224
  9. 9. Qian H.X., Zhou W., Miao J. et al. // J. Micromech. Microeng. 2008. V. 18. P. 035003. https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/18/3/035003
  10. 10. Henry M.D., Shearn M.J., Chhim B., Scherer A. // Nanotechnology. 2010. V. 21. P. 245303. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/21/24/245303
  11. 11. Fischer A.C., Belova L.M., Rikers Y.G.M. et al. // Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012. V. 22. P. 4004. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201200845
  12. 12. Brugger J., Beljakovic G., Despont M. et al. // Microeletron. Eng. 1997. V. 35. P. 401. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-9317 (96)00210-9
  13. 13. Sievila P., Chekurov N., Tittonen I. // Nanotechnology. 2010. V. 21. P. 145301. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/21/14/145301
  14. 14. Robins A.C., Cerchiara R.R., Fischione P.E. et al. // J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2013. V. 471. P. 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/471/1/012046
  15. 15. Harper J.M.E., Cuomo J.J., Kaufman H.R. // Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1983.V. 13. P. 413. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ms.13.080183.002213
  16. 16. Lee R.E. VLSI electronics: microstructure science. V. 8. Academic Press, Inc., 1984. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-234108-3.50016-9
  17. 17. Sawyer W.D., Weber J., Nabert G. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 1990. V. 68. P. 6179. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.346908
  18. 18. Chason E., Picraux S.T., Poate J.M. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 1997. V. 81. P. 6513. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.365193
  19. 19. Howitt D.G. // J. Electron Microsc. Tech. 1984. V. 1. P. 405. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.1060010409
  20. 20. Helmer B.A., Graves D.B. // J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A. 1998. V. 16. P. 3502. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.580993
  21. 21. Валов А.Ф., Аветисов В.А. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 5. С. 17. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22050107
  22. 22. Buttari D., Chini A., Palacios T. et al. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003. V. 83. P. 4779. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1632035
  23. 23. Mikhailenko M.S., Pestov A.E., Chkhalo N.I. et al. // Appl. Optics. 2022. V. 61. № 10. P. 2825. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.455096
  24. 24. Takenaka H., Oishi Y., Ueda D. // J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. 1994. V. 12. P. 3107. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.587486
  25. 25. Wu H., Cargo J. // Proc. 28th Int. Symp. Testing and Failure Analysis. Ohio, USA: ASM Int. 2002. P. 675. https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.cp.istfa2002p0675
  26. 26. Ross R. J. Microelectronics Failure Analysis, Desk Reference. Sixth Edition. Ohio, USA. ASM Int., 2011.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library