RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceХимическая физика Advances in Chemical Physics

  • ISSN (Print) 0207-401X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6126

Estimation of emissions from metallurgical plants using infrared fourier transform spectroscopy

PII
10.31857/S0207401X24060052-1
DOI
10.31857/S0207401X24060052
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 43 / Issue number 6
Pages
41-52
Abstract
Every year, metallurgical plants emit hundreds of thousands of tons of harmful substances into the atmosphere. Remote sensing of flue gases from chimneys of metallurgical plants is an urgent task for both industrial enterprises themselves and environmental control systems of nearby settlements. In this work, based on the results of remote optical monitoring of emissions from chimneys of metallurgical plants of the MMC “Norilsk Nickel’s”, Polar Division, the concentration of sulfur dioxide in the flue gases was estimated. The measurements were carried out using Infrared Fourier Transform Spectrometers operating in the range 7–13 µm with 4 cm-1 spectral resolution. A new technology for remote optical sensing in a passive mode of flue gases from metallurgical plants is proposed, including measurements both on cross sections of chimneys and plumes.
Keywords
металлургическое предприятие выбросы дымовых труб диоксид серы экологический мониторинг инфракрасная фурье-спектроскопия
Date of publication
14.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
2

References

  1. 1. Голяк Ил.С., Анфимов Д.Р., Винтайкин И.Б. и др. // Хим. физика. 2023. Т. 42. № 4. C. 3; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23040088
  2. 2. Rossi R., Ciparisse J.F., Gelfusa M. et al. // J. Instrum. 2019. V. 14. № 3. Article C03004; https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/14/03/C03004
  3. 3. Donateo A., Villani M.G., Feudo T.L. et al. // Atmosphere. 2020. V. 11. № 10. P. 1054; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11101054
  4. 4. Морозов И.И., Васильев Е.С., Волков Н.Д. и др. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 10. С. 16; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22100089
  5. 5. Gaudio P., Gelfusa M., Malizia A. et al. // J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2015. V. 658. № 1. Article 012004; https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/658/1/012004
  6. 6. Gaudio P., Malizia A., Gelfusa M. et al. // J. Instrum. 2017. V. 12. № 1. C01054; https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/C01054
  7. 7. Sung L.Y., Shie R.H., Lu C.J. // J. Hazard. Mater. 2014. V. 265. P. 30; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.11.006
  8. 8. Фуфурин И.Л., Шлыгин П.Е., Позвонков А.А. и др. // Хим. физика. 2021. Т. 40. № 10. С. 68; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X21100046
  9. 9. Kau N., Jindal G., Kaur R. et al. // Results Chem. 2022. V. 4. 100678; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2022.100678
  10. 10. Carlisle C.B., van der Laan J.E., Carr L.W. et al. // Appl. Opt. 1995. V. 34. № 27. P. 6187; https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.006187
  11. 11. Pierrottet D.F., Senft D.C. // Chemical and Biological Sensing / Ed. Gardner P.J. Proc. SPIE. 2000. V. 4036. P. 17; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.394075
  12. 12. Li J., Yu Z., Du Z. et al. // Remote Sens. 2020. V. 12. № 17. Article 2771; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172771
  13. 13. Yang Z., Zhang Y., Chen Y. et al. // Opt. Commun. 2022. V. 518. № 5. Article 128359; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2022.128359
  14. 14. Голубков Г.В., Адамсон С.О., Борчевкина О.П. и др. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 5. С. 53; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22050053
  15. 15. Innocenti F., Robinson R., Gardiner T. et al. // Remote Sens. 2017. V. 9. № 9. Article 953; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090953
  16. 16. Cezard N., Le Mehaute S., Le Gouët J. et al. // Opt. Express. 2020. V. 28. № 15. P. 22345; https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.394553
  17. 17. Johansson M., Galle B., Yu T. et al. // Atmos. Environ. 2008. V. 42. № 29. P. 6926; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.025
  18. 18. Wang S., Zhou B., Wang Z. et al. // J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2012. V. 117. Article D13305; https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016983
  19. 19. Constantin D.E., Merlaud A., van Roozendael M. et al. // Sensors. 2013. V. 13. № 3. P. 3922; https://doi.org/10.3390/s130303922
  20. 20. Tan W., Liu C., Wang S. et al. // Atmos. Res. 2020. V. 245. № 2. 105037; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105037
  21. 21. Vojtisek-Lom M., Zardini A.A., Pechout M. et al. // Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2020. V. 13. № 11. P. 5827; https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5827-2020
  22. 22. Sun Q., Liu T., Yu X. et al. // Sens. Actuators, B. 2023. V. 390. Article 133901; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2023.133901
  23. 23. Фуфурин И.Л., Винтайкин И.Б., Назолин А.Л. и др. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 5. С. 28; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X2205003X
  24. 24. Schröter M., Obermeier A., Brüggemann D. et al. // J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2003. V. 53. № 6. P. 716; https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2003.10466213
  25. 25. Mønster J., Kjeldsen P., Scheutz C. // Waste Manag. 2019. V. 87. P. 835; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.12.047
  26. 26. Boreisho A.S., Volodenko V.A., Gryaznov N.A. et al. // Laser Optics 2003: High-Power Gas Lasers / Ed. Danilov O.B. Proc. SPIE. 2004. V. 5479. P. 177; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.558393
  27. 27. Yue B., Yu S., Li M. et al. // Remote Sens. 2022. V. 14. № 20. Article 5150; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14205150
  28. 28. Tan W., Zhao S., Liu C. et al. // Atmos. Environ. 2019. V. 200. P. 228; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.009
  29. 29. Hamilton P.M., Varey R.H., Millán M.M. // Proc. Intern. Sympos. Sulfur in the Atmosphere. Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, 1977. V. 12. P. 127; https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-022932-4.50017-3
  30. 30. Theys N., De Smedt I., Yu H. et al. // Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2017. V. 10. № 1. P. 119; https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-119-2017
  31. 31. Gamal G., Abdeldayem O.M., Elattar H. et al. // Sustainability. 2023. V. 15. № 12. Article 9362; ttps://doi.org/10.3390/su15129362
  32. 32. Bauduin S., Clarisse L., Clerbaux C. et al. // J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2014. V. 119. № 7. P. 4253; ttps://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021405
  33. 33. Tømmervik H., Johansen B.E., Pedersen J.P. // Sci. Total Environ. 1995. V. 160–161. P. 753;
  34. 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697 (95)04409-T
  35. 35. Богатырев Д.М., Петров Г.В., Цымбулов Л.Б. // Вестн. Магнитогорского гос. технического ун-та им. Г.И. Носова. 2022. Т. 20. № 1. С. 14; https://doi.org/10.18503/1995-2732-2022-20-1-14-24
  36. 36. Гос. докл. “О состоянии и охране окружающей среды в Красноярском крае” за 2019 год; ttp://www.mpr.krskstate.ru/envir/page5849/0/id/45884
  37. 37. Михайленко С.Н., Бабиков Ю.Л., Головко В.Ф. // Оптика атмосферы и океана. 2005. Т. 18. № 9. С. 765.
  38. 38. Fufurin I.L., Golyak I., Bashkin S. et al. // Proc. SPIE. Optics + Optoelectronics. 2021. V. 11775. Article 1177512; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2588714
  39. 39. Морозов А.Н., Светличный С.И. Основы фурье-радиоспектрометрии. 2-е изд., испр. и доп. М: Наука, 2014.
  40. 40. Goyal R., Khare M. // J. Civil. Environ. Eng. 2012. V. 1. S1;https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-784X.S1-001
  41. 41. Kashkin V.B., Zuev D.V., Kurako M.A. et al. // IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 2018. V. 193. № 1. Article 012029; https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/193/1/012029
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library