RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceХимическая физика Advances in Chemical Physics

  • ISSN (Print) 0207-401X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6126

Heterocyclic molecules fragmentation due to single electron capture by doubly charged ions

PII
10.31857/S0207401X24120018-1
DOI
10.31857/S0207401X24120018
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 43 / Issue number 12
Pages
3-15
Abstract
The of adenine (Ade, C5H5N5) and cyclodiglycine (DKP, C4H6N2O2) ions fragmentation formed in the singly electron capture during the interaction of molecules in the gas phase with C2+ and O2+ ions with an energy of 12 keV have been studied. The experimentally observed dependence of the relative fragmentation cross section of molecular ions on the type of projectile is qualitatively explained within the framework of the quasi-molecular model. Using the multi-configuration method of self-consistent field in complete active space (CASSCF), calculations of the fragmentation reaction paths of Ade+ and DKP+ ions were performed. The calculated appearance energies are in good agreement with the available experimental data.
Keywords
гетероциклические соединения циклодиглицин аденин захват одного электрона фрагментация молекулярных ионов массспектрометрия метод CASSCF квазимолекулярная модель
Date of publication
15.12.2024
Year of publication
2024
Number of purchasers
0
Views
46

References

  1. 1. Jochims H.-W., Schwell M., Baumgärtel H. et al. // Chem. Phys. 2005. V. 314. № 1–3. P. 263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2005.03.008
  2. 2. Pilling S., Lago A.F., Coutinho L.H. et al. // Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2007. V. 21. № 22. P. 3646. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.3259
  3. 3. Barreiro-Lage D., Bolognesi P., Chiarinelli J. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021. V. 12. № 30. P. 7379. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01788
  4. 4. Chiarinelli J., D. Barreiro-Lage D., Bolognesi P. et al. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022. V. 24. P. 5855. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CP05811H
  5. 5. Barreiro-Lage D., Chiarinelli J., Bolognesi P. et al. // Ibid. 2023. V. 25. № 23. P. 15635. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CP00608E
  6. 6. Feil S., Gluch K., Matt-Leubner S. et al. // J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 2004 V. 37(15). № 3013. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/37/15/001
  7. 7. Dawley M.M., Tanzer K., Cantrell W.A. et al. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014. V. 16. № 45. P. 25039. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP03452J
  8. 8. Van der Burgt P.J.M., Finnegan S., Eden S. // Eur. Phys. J. D. 2015. V. 69. № 173. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2015-60200-y
  9. 9. Li B., Ma X., Zhu X. L. et al. // J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 2009. V. 42(7). № 075204. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/42/7/075204
  10. 10. De Vries J., Hoekstra R., Morgenstern R. et al. // Ibid. 2002. V. 35(21). № 4373. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/35/21/304
  11. 11. Tabet J., Eden S., Feil S. et al. // Intern. J. Mass Spectrom. 2010. V. 292. № 1. P. 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2010.03.002
  12. 12. Afrosimov V.V., Basalaev A.A., Vasyutinskii O.S. et al. // Eur. Phys. J. D. 2015. V. 69. № 3. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2014-50435-5
  13. 13. Басалаев А.А., Кузьмичев В.В., Панов М Н. и др. // Письма в ЖТФ. 2022. Т. 48. № 17. С. 13. https://doi.org/10.21883/PJTF.2022.17.53280.19238
  14. 14. Basalaev A.A., Kuz’michev V.V., Panov M.N. et al. // Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2022. V. 193(4). № 109984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.109984
  15. 15. Басалаев А.А., Кузьмичев В.В., Панов М.Н. и др. // ЖТФ. 2022. Т. 92. № 7. С. 978. https://doi.org/10.21883/JTF.2022.07.52654.309-21
  16. 16. Barca G.M.J., Bertoni C., Carrington L. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 2020. V. 152(15) № 154102. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0005188
  17. 17. Дьяков Ю.А., Адамсон С.О., Ванг П.К. и др. // Хим. физика. 2021. Т. 40. № 10. С. 22. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X21100034
  18. 18. Дьяков Ю.А., Адамсон С.О., Ванг П.К. и др. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 6. С. 85. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22060036
  19. 19. Храпковский Г.М., Аристов И.В., Егоров Д.Л. и др. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 9. С. 19. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22070068
  20. 20. Басалаев А.А., Кузьмичев В.В., Панов М.Н. и др. // Хим. физика. 2023. Т. 42. № 10. С. 16. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23100035
  21. 21. Hush N.S., Cheung A.S. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 1975. V. 34. P. 11.
  22. 22. Hwang C.T., Stumpf C.L., Yu Y.-Q. et al. // Intern. J. Mass Spectrom. 1999. V. 182/183. P. 253.
  23. 23. Russo N., Toscano M., Grand A. // J. Comput. Chem. 2000. V. 21. № 14. P. 1243.
  24. 24. Improta R., Scalmani G., Barone V. // Intern. J. Mass Spectrom. 2000. V. 201. P. 321.
  25. 25. Janev R.K., Presnyakov L.P. // Phys. Rep. 1981. V. 70. № 1. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573 (81)90161-7
  26. 26. Lin J., Yu C., Peng S., Akiyama I. et al. // J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1980. V. 102. P. 4627.
  27. 27. Trofimov A.B., Schirmer J., Kobychev V.B. et al. // J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 2006. V. 39. № 2. P. 305. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/39/2/007
  28. 28. Arachchilage A.P.W., Wang F., Feyer V. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 2010. V. 133(17). № 174319. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3499740
  29. 29. Franz J., Gianturco F.A. // Eur. Phys. J. D. 2014. V. 68. P. 279. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2014-50072-0
  30. 30. Kramida A., Ralchenko Yu., Reader J. et al. // NIST Atomic Spectra Database (version 5.9). 2021. https://doi.org/10.18434/T4W30F
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library