- PII
- S3034612625110085-1
- DOI
- 10.7868/S3034612625110085
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 44 / Issue number 11
- Pages
- 67-75
- Abstract
- Artificial blood vessels made from fluoropolymer using electrospinning have high biocompatibility. They have unique combinations of strength, chemical resistance, and open interconnected porosity. This provides favourable conditions for endothelialization. The aim of this study is to investigate the structures and properties of these artificial vessels, formed from Russian fluoropolymer materials such as poly(tetrafluoroethylene), copolymers of virulence fluoride and tetrafluoroethylene, and polyvinylidenefluoroide. Depending on the fluoropolymer used, structural characteristics of vessel walls, surface free energies, strengths, elongations, and interactions with human mesenchymal stem cells are investigated. It has been demonstrated that a copolymer of viridenedifluoride with tetrafluoroethylene represents the most promising material for vessel manufacturing using electrospinning technology.
- Keywords
- политетрафторэтилен сополимер винилиденфторида с тетрафторэтиленом поливинилиденфторид искусственные сосуды электроформование
- Date of publication
- 20.05.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 26
References
- 1. Kumar V. A., Brewster L. P., Caves J.M., Chaikof E.L. // Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 2011. V. 2. P. 137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-011-0049-3
- 2. Kochervinskii V.V., Gradov O.V., Gradova M.A. // Russ. Chem. Rev. 2022. V. 91. № 11. RCR5037. https://doi.org/10.57634/RCR5037
- 3. Duran-Rey D., Sanchez-Rumboet C, Brito-Pereira R. et al. // British J. Surg. 2025. V. 112. Issue Suppl. 2. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae322.012
- 4. Wenbin Sun, Chuang Gao, Huazhen Liu et al. // ACS Biomat. Sci. Eng. 2024. V.10. № 5. P. 2805. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01989
- 5. Zhou Siqi, Liu Yulu, Yu Xueke et al. // ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2024. V.7. № 10. P. 6985. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.4c01098
- 6. Mel’nik E.Y., Martynov G.A., Lozovskii M.S. et al. // Biomed. Eng. 2025. V. 58. P. 397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-025-10443-1
- 7. Melnik E., Stankevich K., Zinovyev A. et al. // J. Fluor. Chem. 2022. V. 264. P. 110062 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluchem.2022.110062
- 8. Goreninskii S., Yuriev Y., Runts A. et al. // Polymers. 2024. V. 16. P. 3524. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16243524
- 9. Shershnev I.V., Kopylov A.S., Cherkasova A.V., Solovieva A.B. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2022. V. 16. № 7. P. 1277. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793122070156
- 10. Dongfang Wang, Yiyang Xu, Qian Li, Lih-Sheng Turng // J. Mater. Chem. B. 2020. V. 8. P. 1801. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TB01849B
- 11. Vorobyev A. O., Kulbakin D. E, Chistyakov S. G. et al. // Chem. Phys. Polym. Mater. 2024. V. 17 P. 1316. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793123060106
- 12. Hamed Amani, Hamidreza Arzaghi, Mehrdad Bayandori et al. // Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 2019. V. 6. № 13. P. 1900572. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201900572
