- PII
- S3034612625120034-1
- DOI
- 10.7868/S3034612625120034
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 44 / Issue number 12
- Pages
- 25
- Abstract
- The energy budget is calculated for the elementary steps involved in the reaction between carbon oxide and the gold hydride (H–Au–H) producing (HCO–Au–HCO). The hydride (H–Au–H) is formed by adsorption of H on the simplest negatively charged gold cluster, Au . A detailed mechanism is proposed for reaction between O and (HCO–Au–HCO), and the energy budget is calculated for the elementary steps involved in the production of (Au–CO), HO, and CO. Based on the calculated results, an explanation is proposed for the experimental data on interaction of hydrogen, carbon oxide, and oxygen with gold nanoparticles deposited on pyrolytic graphite. Since the gold nanoparticles located on graphite are negatively charged, the calculations are performed accordingly for negatively charged gold-containing particles.
- Keywords
- квантовохимическое моделирование элементарные реакции наночастицы золота водород окись углерода кислород
- Date of publication
- 03.03.2026
- Year of publication
- 2026
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 64
References
- 1. Raptis C., Garcia H., Stratakis M. // Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009. V. 48. P. 3133. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200805838
- 2. Taylor S.F.R., Sa J., Hardacre C. // ChemCatChem. 2011. V. 3. P. 119. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201000337
- 3. Zhu Y., Tian L., Jiang Z. et. al. // J. Catal. 2011. V. 281. P. 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2011.04.007
- 4. Corma A., Serna P. // Science. 2006. V. 313. P. 332. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128383
- 5. Guzman J., Gates B.C. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004. V. 126. P. 2672. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja039426e
- 6. Ануфриенко В.Ф., Мороз Б.Л., Ларина Т.В. и др. // ДАН. 2007. Т. 413. № 4. С. 493. https://doi.org/10.1134/S001250160704001X
- 7. Nikolaev S.A., Golubina E.V., Krotova L.N. et al. // Appl. Catal., B. 2015. V. 168. P. 303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.12.030
- 8. Гришин М.В., Гатин А.К., Слуцкий В.Г. и др. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 6. С. 3. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22060048
- 9. Гришин М.В., Гатин А.К., Слуцкий В.Г. и др. // Хим. физика. 2023. Т. 42. № 1. С. 3. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23010053
- 10. Jena N. K., Chandrakumar K. R. S., Ghosh S. K. // RSC Adv. 2012. V. 27. P. 10262. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ra21032k
- 11. Fujitani T., Nakamura I., Takahashi A. // ACS Catal. 2020. V 10. P. 2517. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b05195
- 12. Гатин А.К., Гришин М.В., Гуревич С.А. и др. // Изв. АН. Сер. хим. 2014. № 8. С. 1696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-014-0655-y
- 13. Гришин М.В., Баймухамбетова Д.Т., Гатин А.К. и др. // Хим. физика. 2025. Т. 44. № 1. С. 44. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X25010056
- 14. 14 Гришин М.В., Гатин А.К., Дохликова Н.В. и др. // Российские нанотехнологии. 2016. Т. 11. № 11–12. С. 49. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995078016060112
- 15. Гришин М.В., Гатин А.К., Сарвадий С.Ю. и др. // Хим. физика. 2025. Т. 44. № 5. С. 33. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X25050044
- 16. Гатин А.К., Гришин М.В., Сарвадий С.Ю., Шуб Б.Р. // Хим. физика. 2018. Т. 37. № 3. С. 48 https://doi.org/10.7868/S0207401X18030081
- 17. Hamers R.J., Wang Y.J. // Chem. Rev. 1996. V. 96. P. 1261 https://doi.org/10.1021/cr950213k
- 18. Гатин А.К., Гришин М.В., Далидчик Ф.И., Ковалевский С.А., Колченко Н.Н. // Хим. физика. 2006. Т. 25. № 6. С. 17.
- 19. Ozaki T. // Phys. Rev. B. 2003. V. 67. P. 155108. https://doi.org/10.1103/Phys/RevB.67.155108
- 20. Ozaki T., Kino H. // Phys. Rev. B. 2004. V. 69. P. 195113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.195113
