- PII
- S0207401X25010046-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0207401X25010046
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 44 / Issue number 1
- Pages
- 36-43
- Abstract
- The work concerns the studying the accuracy of the quasi-static approximation for the calculation of the kinetics of singlet fission (SF) in molecular semiconductors. The SF is known to be accompanied by inverse TT-annihilation (TTA), which essentially controls the specific features of the SF-kinetics. The analysis of the SF-kinetics in the wide time region has been made, which covers both short times usually associated with the stage of geminate TTA and long times typical for the bimolecular TTA. The simple models have been proposed, analysis of which demonstrated good accuracy of formulas, derived within the quasistatic approximation, in the description of SF-kinetics. High accuracy of interpolation formulas, which combine the obtained expressions and allow for describing the kinetics at different stages of the process, is also demonstrated. The proposed formulas are shown to significantly simplify the description of the experimental results.
- Keywords
- распад синглета триплет-триплетная аннигиляция
- Date of publication
- 14.09.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 12
References
- 1. Miyata K., Conrad-Burton F.S., Geyer F.L. и др. // Chem. Rev. 2019. V. 119. P. 4261. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00572
- 2. Casanova D. // Chem. Rev. 2018. V. 118. P. 7164. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00601
- 3. Smith M. B., Michl J.// Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2013. V. 64. P. 361. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040412-110130
- 4. Merrifield R. E.//J. Chem. Phys. 1968. V. 48. P. 4318. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1669777
- 5. Suna A. // Phys. Rev. B. 1970. V. 1. P. 1716. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.1.1716
- 6. Shushin A. I. // J. Chem. Phys. 2022. V. 156. P. 074703. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0078158
- 7. Bossanyi D. G., Sasaki Y., Wang S. // Mater. Chem. C. 2022. V.10, P. 4684. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1tc02955j
- 8. Ветчинкин А. С., Уманский С. Я., Чайкина Ю. А. и др. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 9. С. 72. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22090102
- 9. Шушин А. И., Уманский С. Я., Чайкина Ю. А. // Хим. физика. 2023. Т. 42. № 7. С. 86. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23070178
- 10. Шушин А. И., Уманский С. Я., Чайкина Ю. А. // Хим. физика. 2023. Т. 42. № 12. С. 75. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23120105 .
- 11. Уманский С. Я., Адамсон С. О., Ветчинкин А. С. и др. // Хим. физика. 2023. Т. 42. № 4. С. 31. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23040143
- 12. Ryansnyanskiy A., Biaggio I. // Phys. Rev. B. 2011. V. 84. P. 193203. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.193203
- 13. Barhoumi T., Monge J. L., Mejatty M. и др. // Eur. Phys. J. B. 2007. V. 59. P. 167.
- 14. Piland G. B., Burdett J. J., Kurunthu D. и др. // J. Phys. Chem. 2013. V. 117. P. 1224. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp309286v
- 15. Pilland G. B., Burdett J. J., Dillon R. J. и др. // J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014. V. 5. P. 2312. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz500676c
- 16. Shushin A. I. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 1985. V. 118. P. 197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614 (85)85297-0
- 17. Shushin A. I. // J. Chem. Phys. 1991. V. 95. P. 3657. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.460817
- 18. Shushin A. I. // J. Chem. Phys. 1992. V. 97. P. 1954. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.463132
- 19. Steiner U. E., Ulrich T. // Chem. Rev. 1989. V. 89. P. 514. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00091a003
- 20. Shushin A. I. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 2017. V. 678. P. 283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2017.04.068
- 21. Shushin A. I. // J. Chem. Phys. 2019. V. 151. P. 034103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5099667
- 22. Shushin A. I. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 2023. V. 811. P. 140199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2022.140199
